Jobsinghana.com
 

Consultancy (TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR END OF PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF THE NORTHERN GHANA CLIMATE RESILIENCE PROGRAMME)

JOB SUMMARY

Company Anglican Dioc...
Industry Not-for-profi...
Category International...
Location Bolgatanga
Job Status Full-time
Salary GH¢ 
Education Advanced Degr...
Experience 5 years
Job Expires Oct 30, 2021
Contact ...
 

Company Profile

The Anglican Diocesan Development and Relief Organization (ADDRO) is a non-profit, non-governmental organization that seeks to transform lives and uphold human dignity and justice for all people, irrespective of ethnicity, sex, religion, or political affiliations. ADDRO’s mission is inspired by the mission of Jesus Christ in Luke 4:18 “To bring good news to the poor, to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed….”
Thus, ADDRO exists to respond to the human needs of the people of Ghana to enable them to live dignified lives. ADDRO’s vision is a transformed society living meaningful and dignified lives. As a national organization, ADDRO operates in six regions of Ghana namely, Upper East, Upper West, North-East, Northern, Ashanti, , and Eastern Regions.
The thematic areas of ADDRO are Agriculture and sustainable livelihoods, Community-Based Health, Gender Equity and Social Inclusion (GESI), Environment and Climate Change, Governance and peacebuilding, Disaster and relief, Education and Capacity development.

 

Job Description

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR END OF PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF THE NORTHERN GHANA CLIMATE RESILIENCE PROGRAMME
 
1.0 INTRODUCTION
ADDRO, in partnership with Episcopal Relief & Development, USA, has been implementing a Food security and livelihood support programme in the Upper East Region of Ghana since 2006. From 2013 to 2017 ADDRO implemented a 5-year Food Security and Livelihood programme, and an end-of-phase evaluation was conducted in 2017.
 
 In 2018, ADDRO and its partner Episcopal Relief & Development started a new programme called Northern Ghana Climate Resilience Programme (NGCRP). The goal of the programme is to build community resilience for adaptation to climate change. The programme has three main pillars: Food Security and Livelihoods, Economic Development and the Environment. The Food Security and Livelihoods component seeks to increase beneficiary communities’ resilience and adaptations to climate change impacts through the use of sustainable agricultural production systems such as climate-smart agriculture or improved farming techniques. The Economic Development focuses on facilitating economic empowerment of program participants through viable economic or income generation activities and savings. These are comprised of Savings with Education (SwE) and Micro Credit scheme.  The Environment pillar aims at implementing activities which will promote the mitigation of climate change and variability on the environment as well as reduces community exposures to natural hazards such as floods, droughts and erosions. Baseline Survey was conducted in July 2018
 
2.0 BACKGROUND of The Northern Ghana Climate Program
Climate Change and variability has become a global concern because its effects and risk are spread across the globe, posing a lot of developmental challenges to countries worldwide, particularly developing countries. 
 
A Climate Change Risk Profile of Ghana compiled by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (2017)  revealed that Ghana will experience changes and variability in its climate such as increase in average annual temperatures between 1.4–5.8°C by 2080, with the greatest increases in  northern Ghana (including ADDRO’s Climate Resilience Program catchment areas); 18% to 59% increase in the number of hot days and nights in a year by 2060; and a decrease in overall rainfall of 4.4 percent by 2040 with more erratic and intense rainfall during the wet season and lower precipitation levels during the dry season. The   effects on the other parts of Ghana; include; rise in sea surface temperatures by approximately 2–4°C; sea level rise of 75–190 mm by 2100; and average coastal erosion and shoreline loss of 0.38 m per year. 
 
The effects of these changes and variability are that the rising temperatures are projected to lower yields in major staple crops such as cassava, yams, plantains, maize and rice. Total crop failure is expected to occur approximately once every five years in regions of northern Ghana due to delayed or diminished rains. This will compound the problem of household food insecurity, poverty and seasonal migrations from rural communities to cities. 
 
In Ghana, like most African countries, climate change impacts affect all sectors and their objectives, particularly on the environment, economic and social development. Ghana is particularly vulnerable because its economy relies heavily on climate-sensitive sectors such as agriculture and forestry, which provide the bulk of domestic energy supply, food and employment. About a third of Ghana's Gross Domestic Product is contributed by the renewable natural resource sector. Agriculture in particular is seriously affected because it is mainly rain-fed.
 
Given the significant negative impacts of climate change globally, climate resilience has become a critical concept that scientific institutions, policymakers, governments, international and local organizations have begun to adopt as measures to reverse global warming. ADDRO’s Northern Ghana Climate Resilience Programme intends to build the ecosystem and community’s resilience for adaptation to climate change in the three main pillars comprising food security and rural livelihoods, economic development, and the environment.
 
3.0 OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMMEME
  • Objective 1: To increase climate-smart agricultural production and productivity of 800 farmers by 30% by 2021 (200 farmers targeted for 2018, 200 farmers targeted in 2019, 500 farmers targeted in 2020and 500 target in 2021).
  • Objective 2:  To increase the wealth of 1104 saving with Education group members by 2021 (276 group members targeted for 2018, 2019 each and 1104 in 2020 and 805 in 2021).
  • Objective 3: To support 30 communities to adopt innovative and sustainable environmental and land conservation practices to reduce climate Change risks by 2021 (8 communities targeted for 2018, 10 in 2019 and 10 communities in 2020 and 10 communities in 2021).
4.0 PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
The Northern Ghana climate Resilience programme (NGCRP) supports communities to deal with the consequences of climate change.  Climate change, which is caused mostly by human activity, directly and indirectly is posing a lot of developmental challenges to countries worldwide, particularly developing countries. The implementation strategies are based on the pillars as discussed below

Pillar 1: Food security and livelihoods. This component seeks to increase beneficiary communities’ resilience and adaptations to climate change impacts through interventions/adaptation such as climate-smart agriculture or improve farming techniques to protect food growing such as planting drought-resistant and short-season varieties, changing agricultural practices, crop diversification, practices to enhance soil moisture retention in fields, minimal tillage, composting for fertilizer, planting dry season vegetable gardens, developing surface wells, rearing small stock  such as  guinea fowl, goats, sheep, pigs and rabbits) and actions to reduce burning of farm fields as well as increasing and diversifying livelihood security of households. 

Pillar 2:  Economic development. This pilar proposes the uses of saving services to address vulnerability to poverty due to changes in climatic conditions, which renders people of northern Ghana unable to withstand climate stresses/shocks. The two saving services will support households and communities to become less susceptible to climate change shocks and stresses. The first component comprises interventions on Savings with Education (SwE). The saving with Education program is a village savings-led model where rural poor women are supported to save regularly to enable them start micro businesses. The project provides a forum for women entrepreneurs to share their experience and to provide peer-to-peer business mentoring without the involvement of an outsider. Project officers use this opportunity to educate group members on the good agricultural practices, environment/natural resource management and health related issues. Additionally, capacities of micro-entrepreneurs are built for effective implementation of their business activities such as agro-processing businesses. In this context, business education and entrepreneurship training for microcredit recipients are key implementation strategies. Working with and through community-based women’s associations that are accustomed to operating businesses, NGCRP will strengthen business entrepreneurs’ capacity to provide ongoing support to their members who have started their own businesses as well as strengthening their capacities and sustainability by linking them to creditable formal financial institutions such as banks.

Pillar 3: Environment: This pillar aims at increasing practices which will promote the mitigation of climate change and variability on the environment as well as reduces community exposures to natural hazards such as floods, droughts and erosions. Under this pillar, the project facilitates sustainable soil and water conservation and management of land and forest resources.  Additionally, the project use Agro-forestry systems (plantation of trees in cropland as well as along reserved areas and water bodies) that can provide multiple benefits including energy to rural communities with synergies between sustainable development and Climate Change mitigation such as conservation of water resources and prevention of floods. Activities such as inappropriate use of agro-chemical and other practices that pollute the environment, water bodies and impact negatively on the lives of the people, are addressed. Community education via radio and durbars and the celebration of World Environment Days to create awareness about the need for sustainable environmental management are carried out with relevant messages to protecting the environment such as prevention of the perennial bush fire disasters. 

The program intervention key strategies based on each of the objectives which supports the five pillars as outlined below.
 
Objective 1:To increase climate-smart agricultural production and productivity farmers by 30% by 2021 
Strategies 
  • To provide input support to farmers to increase production and productivity
  • Build and strengthen capacity of local farmers to increase agricultural productivity and awareness of climate issues. 
  • Build and strengthen capacity of Climate Resilience Volunteers in new farming technologies in order to enhance their support for farmers
  • Create awareness on climate change and its adaptation strategies 
  • Promote cultivation of crops and rearing of animals adapted to harsh climatic conditions    
  • Train farmers to promote post-harvest technologies to minimize losses of farm produce.
Objective 2: To increase the wealth of Savings with Education group members by 2021).
Strategies
  • Formation of new Saving with Education Groups among crop farmers (agro input credit);  small ruminant farmers,  and Micro credit participants 
  • Provision of continuous support to existing saving groups
  • Education of group members on GAP and health related issues
  • Build capacity of groups on saving and group management
  • Linking with formal financial institutions
  • Programme participant of all the interventions will be sensitize on the benefits of savings with education and facilitated to form or join groups. The target is to form about 10 groups from the programme participants
Objective 3: To support 30 communities to adopt innovative and sustainable environmental and land conservation practices to reduce climate Change risks by 2021 
Strategies
  1. Maintaining healthy forest ecosystems for resilience 
  2. Raise awareness on environmental degradation
  3. Building resilience for adaptation to climate change by supporting school clubs, religious bodies and communities in the planting and management of trees
5.0 EXPECTED PROGRAMMEME OUTCOMES
  1. Trained farmers who applied new technologies or management practices increased
  2. Trained farmers who applied climate-smart technologies or management practices increased
  3. Farmers increase their yields of targeted crop(s) 
  4. Farmers increase total production of targeted animal(s)
  5. Group members saving money during the cycle (12-month period) increased
  6. Primary caregivers of children under 5 who are members of savings groups and report using their savings, earnings, or loans for the basic needs of children or child health/other emergencies (disaggregated by use/purpose) increased
  7. Increased survival rate of trees planted
5.1 Outcome Indicators
  1. Percent of trained farmers who applied new technologies or management practices
  2. Percent of trained farmers who applied climate-smart technologies or management practices
  3. Percent of farmers who increase yields of targeted crop(s)
  4. Percent of farmers who increase total production of targeted animal(s)
  5. Average group member savings at end of cycle (12-month period)
  6. Average group member earnings at end of cycle (12-month period)
  7. Percent of households that report change in assets since joining the program
  8. Percent of primary caregivers of children under 5 who are members of savings groups and report using their savings, earnings, or loans for the basic needs of children or child health/other emergencies (disaggregated by use/purpose)
  9. Percent of savings group members who have started or expanded micro-businesses using loans
  10. Survival Rate of trees
6.0 THE TERMS OF REFERENCE
 
6.1 Purpose of the Evaluation
The Purpose of this End-of- Programme Evaluation is to assess the outcome performance, and identify impact as well as lessons learnt to inform decisions and practices of the organization for further development of the programme or guidance of similar programmes in future. To this end, the evaluation should generate knowledge about what does and does not work in the field and why, and to have that knowledge shape our policy and practice.
 
6.2 Objectives of the Evaluation
The objectives of this evaluation include the following: 
  1. To assess the performance of the project with regards to its set objectives, indicators/outcomes
  2. To assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the project activities in achieving those outcomes
  3. To assess the extent, the program might have contributed to long-term effect on the beneficiaries.
  4. To identify lessons learned, gaps if any and make recommendations for future consideration for the audience of this evaluation.
7.0   KEY EVALUATION QUESTIONS
The evaluation will examine the outputs and outcomes of the ADDRO’s NGCRP flagship program and will focus on the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability.
  1. To assess whether the programs’ objectives were met
  2. Learning from the steps on the way in the programs’ implementation.
    • Accountability: examine to what extent NGCRP’s activities and inputs meet the programs outputs, outcomes, goals and expectations. 
    • Learning: examine how to steer the portfolio of similar projects in future
Evaluation Questions based on;
 1. Programme Relevance
        a.  To what extent is the program (NGCRP) expected to contribute to;
                i. increase climate-smart agricultural production and productivity of 800 farmers by 30% by 2021 
                 ii.  increase the wealth of 1104 saving with Education group members by 2021 
                 iii.     support 30 communities to adopt innovative and sustainable environmental and land conservation practices to reduce climate Change risks by 2021 (8 communities targeted for 2018, 10 in 2019 and 10 communities in 2020 and 10 communities in 2021).
 
 b.  Does the program address constraints that hinder the growth and viability of climate-smart agricultural production and productivity of farmers? 
  c.    How well aligned was the program with other donors’ and national governments interventions in the value chains (no risk of incoherence or duplication)? 
2.  Programme Effectiveness:
      a.  To what extent are the planned outputs and outcomes, as defined in the programs’ proposals achieved? 
       b.  What internal and external factors (both positive and negative) have aided/inhibited the project to meet expected results and targets? 
        c.  Were the M&E frameworks suitable to monitor and support implementation of the targeted results?
3.  Programme Efficiency:
     a.  Were the financial resources used efficiently to achieve outputs? 
      b.  Did the actual results (outputs and outcomes) justify the costs incurred? Were resources effectively utilized? 
      c. What factors facilitated or impeded the implementation efficiency?
      d. Was the project management of the respective programs appropriately established, staffed and equipped?
      e. Can the effectiveness of the three programs be compared and if so, what are the relevant observations?
4.  Programme Sustainability:
a. To what extend are the strategies and activities being taken up by policy and public /   private organizations?
     b. What is the likelihood of continuation of outcomes, scalability of outcomes and systems change beyond the scope and timespan of the programs?
      c.  In case of reduced likelihood of sustainability, scalability and systems change what are the causes and how could subsequent programs learn from that?
      d.  Will the Saving with Education Groups among crop farmers continue to exist and be functional after the programs end?
5. Recommendation 
     a.  What lessons can be learnt to steer the portfolio of similar projects in future? 
      b. What strategy was the best in realizing the program goals? 
      c.  What key successes should be replicated in subsequent programs for better impact?
 
8.0 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
The programme operates in five districts of the Upper East Region namely Bawku West District, Bongo District, Talensi District, Nabdam District and Bolgatanga Municipality. The programme worked with four main categories of participants. Crop /vegetable farmers, Small ruminant rearing groups, Micro-Credit entrepreneurs, Savings with Education participants. Each year the programme targets new beneficiary groups as indicated in the table below. All these are within the primary targets for this evaluation. Besides, ADDRO staff and Community Volunteers (Climate Resilience volunteers) are also within the evaluation scope to provide clarifying information and documentations when the need arises in the course of the evaluation

Table 1: Number of participants for each year group

No

Programme Participant group

Number of  participants / Year one (2018)

Number of  participants / Year one (2019)

Number of  participants / Year one (2020)

Number of  participants/Year one (2021)

Total

1a

Crop farmers

200

199

200

300

899

1b

Vegetable farmers

50

50

200

200

500

2

Small Ruminant and Pig farmers

100

102

110

111

423

3

SwE

274

402

728

777

2181

4

Micro- credit clients

167

144

62

64

333

 
 
9.0 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
The selected consultant will be responsible for developing an appropriate methodology for this evaluation. The consultant shall employ both quantitative and qualitative methods in the assessment of the program. The sampling technique/methodology is expected to be scientific, and appropriate reasoning should be given for the choice. ADDRO and Episcopal Relief & Development have standard qualitative and quantitative tools for the survey to be reviewed and used by the consulting team. 
 
The consultant is expected to conduct a participatory evaluation providing for meaningful involvement of the partners, volunteers, programme participants as well as relevant internal and external stakeholders wherever necessary. The methodology for the data collection will include, but not limited to:
  • Interviews (guided by structured and semi-structured questions) and discussions
  • Review of relevant documents and materials; and
  • Focus Group Discussions
  • Key informant Interviews
10.0 CONTRACT PERIOD
The consultant shall have thirty (30) working days (starting from the day the contract will be signed) to complete the entire assignment as detailed in this TOR. In other words, the entire assignment, including submission of proposal, data collection, analyses, and report writing, and submission of the final report shall not exceed 30th November, 2021 (Date may change subject to the date contract is signed)
 
11.0 Expected Outputs (Deliverables) and Reporting Requirements
  1. An inception report; The inception period will be used to mobilize the evaluation team and logistics, fine-tune the approach and methodology, gather initial data, and hold preliminary engagements with intended respondents. The period will also be used to clarify any issues on the terms of reference and deliverables and prepare data collection tools. The evaluator will prepare a report covering the inception work. It will identify any issues and remedial measures agreed with ADDRO. It will include an updated work plan and proposed outline of the evaluation report. The evaluator is also expected to start analysing projects M&E data (baseline data and current project performance measurements e.g. productivity) and based on that propose a methodology which needs to be approved by ADDRO. The available data reports will be shared with the evaluator. The report shall not be longer than 40 pages plus annex.
  • Submit full draft report for review. A first draft report on the evaluation should be provided to ADDRO for feedback. This report will be updated as a final technical report which will be presented to stakeholders at a 1-day virtual validation meeting via zoom (or in-person meeting if there is need) for final comments, questions and inputs. The presentation will highlight main findings, key issues, lessons learned and recommendations. The validation meeting will be held virtually. 
  • Final Technical Report; The evaluator will prepare a final technical report based on the comments received from ADDRO and partners as well as final infographic summary. The final report (in English) should be 35 to 40 pages. The consultant shall submit two (2) hard copies, an electronic copy, raw data, processed (analysis ready) data and Analysis files to ADDRO within thirty (30) days after the contract is signed. 
12.0 USERS AND AUDIENCES OF THE REPORT
The primary users and audiences of the evaluation report shall include the Staff, Management and Board of Directors of ADDRO as well as its partner, Episcopal Relief & Development.
 
The secondary users shall be organizations and institutions (including the religious) affiliated and/ or working on similar programmes or projects in the country, relevant experts, as well as other interested stakeholders.

Required Skills or Experience

13.0 CONSULTANT QUALIFICATION/EXPERTISE REQUIRED
The evaluation will be carried out by a team of two senior specialist consultants. One of the consultants will be the team leader. The following qualifications and experience are required:
  • A good University degree (Masters or above) Agriculture/ social science with relevant academic and professional qualifications and experience;
  • At least five (5) years working experience in evaluation research or similar research work /community research work;
  • Good working knowledge of five Regions of the Northern Ghana environment;
  • Good understanding of study designs or evaluation designs 
  • Good analytical, writing and drafting skills;
  • The team leader will be required to have demonstrated leadership skills and experience, negotiation skills, and an understanding of, and commitment to, participatory approaches in order to direct and co-ordinate the activities of the evaluation team.

How To Apply

Sorry, job has expired.

 
Note

Please note, employers receive numerous applications per posting and will only shortlist the most qualified candidates. Also Jobsinghana.com is not involved in any decision made by an employer/recruiter and therefore does not guarantee that applications sent will result in a candidate being shortlisted/selected for that position.
 
 
To Top